Pointers, connect with, and you will applicant sex inside the U

Pointers, connect with, and you will applicant sex inside the U

101 . Newhagen , John Elizabeth. , “Past self-report: Using latency to answer model the question answering processes to your web-oriented public opinion studies,” in the Sourcebook having Governmental Communication Lookup , eds. Bucy , Erik P. and you can Lance Holbert , Roentgen. ( New york : Routledge , 2011 ).Yahoo Student

102 . Oxley , Douglas R. , Smith , Kevin B. , Alford , John R. , Hibbing , Matthew V. , Miller , Jennifer L. , Scalora , Mario , Hatemi , Peter K. , and Hibbing , John R. , “Political perceptions are very different having physiological characteristics,” Technology , 321 : 1667 – 1670 .CrossRefGoogle Beginner

103 . Swers , Michele L. , “Is actually women more likely to choose for women’s products expense than just the men acquaintances?” Legislative Training Every quarter 1998 , 23 : 435 – 448 .CrossRefGoogle Pupil

104 . Swers , Michele L. , The real difference Women Create: The policy Impression of females from inside the Congress ( Chicago : University from Chi town Drive , 2002 ).Google Pupil

105 . Slope , Kim Quaile and Hurley , Patricia A beneficial. , “Symbolic speeches from the U.S. Senate as well as their representational ramifications,” Record out-of Government 2002 , 64 : 219 – 231 .CrossRefGoogle College student

108 . Mansbridge , Jane , “Should blacks show blacks and you will feminine show women? An excellent contingent ‘yes’,” Journal regarding Government 1999 , 61 ( 3 ): 627 – 657 .CrossRefGoogle Beginner

109 . Sanbonmatsu , Kira , “Gender-associated political knowledge plus the detailed image of women,” Political Choices 2003 , twenty-five : 367 – 388 .CrossRefGoogle College student

110 . Dolan , Kathleen , “Could there be a beneficial ‘gender attraction effect’ in the American government? S. Household elections,” Political Search Quarterly 2008 , 61 : 79 – 89 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

This particular article has been quoted because of the following publications. It listing is done considering data provided by Crossref.

Benstead, Lindsay J. Jamal, Amaney A. and you can Crave, Ellen 2015. Could it be Gender, Religiosity otherwise One another? A task Congruity Theory away from Applicant Electability within the Transitional Tunisia. Views toward Government, Vol. thirteen, Question. 1, p. 74.

Bauer, Nichole Yards. 2015. Exactly who stereotypes female applicants? Distinguishing individual differences in feminine label reliance. Politics, Groups, and you will Identities, Vol. step 3, Matter. 1, p. 94.

Rosenthal , Cindy Simon , “The latest part regarding gender within the descriptive logo,” Political Look Every quarter 1995 , 48 : 599 – 611

McLaughlin, Bryan Davis, Catasha Coppini, David Kim, More youthful Mie Knisely, Sandra and you may McLeod, Douglas 2015. Whenever women assault. Government additionally the Lifestyle Sciences, Vol. 34, Material. step 1, p. 44.

Pyeatt, Nicholas L. and you will Yanus, Alixandra B. 2016. Giving mixed signals: the latest character out-of gender and you can partisanship inside the feedback regarding political leaders. Log from Elections, Public-opinion and you can People, Vol. 26, Matter. 4, p. 423.

Koch, Thomas and you may Obermaier, Magdalena 2016. Having Center and (No) Notice? Just how Recipients Negatively Infer Missing Information about Political figures as well as how This Impacts the newest Research of the Speakermunication Search, Vol. 43, Material. seven, p. 972.

Turska-Kawa, Agnieszka and you will Olszanecka-. Stereotypes Determining Thinking from Female Political leaders: The way Irski mladenke it is of Poland. Government for the Central Europe, Vol. fourteen, Question. 3, p. 7.

Schneider, Monica C. and you will Bos, Angela L. 2019. The employment of Public Role Theory into the Study of Gender from inside the Politics. Political Mindset, Vol. 40, Matter. S1, p. 173.

Playground, Sunshine Younger and you may Baek, More youthful Min 2019. Citizens’ Ambivalence on the Female Politicians: As to the reasons Ambivalence Matters for Gender Equivalence into the a good Democracy. Record of women, Government & Plan, Vol. 40, Point. 2, p. 309.

Rusidze, Nino 2019. Stereotypes, Reputation Assassination and you may Women in Government. Corvinus Record out of Worldwide Circumstances, Vol. 4, Procedure. step one, p. 15.

Aaldering, Loes and Van Der Pas, Daphne Joanna 2020. Political Frontrunners from the Mass media: Gender Prejudice within the Commander Stereotypes through the Venture and you will Program Times. Uk Log from Governmental Science, Vol. fifty, Point. step three, p. 911.

Boer, Noortje 2020. Just how can Residents Determine Path?Height Bureaucrats’ Passion and you can Skills? A great Typology and you can Test. Public Administration Review, Vol. 80, Procedure. cuatro, p. 532.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *